The study showed that the partnership amongst the linear combos from the 2 groups of variables you are going to top end up being said by one work through a Rc worth of
On the PSPP, five points came up, recognized as bodily care about-worthy of, football competence, health, real energy, and you can attractive looks having eigenvalues of 1.78, cuatro.34, step three.59, step three.46, and you will six.08 respectively bookkeeping to own 64% of one’s difference one of many points. Compared with brand new proposed hierarchical design (Fox Corbin, 1989), yet not, this new real notice-really worth measure as well as the glamorous looks subscale demonstrated big grounds convergence and you will was indeed then removed off next data. This factor overlap within glamorous human anatomy and you can physical notice-worthy of bills has been reported in other places (Sonstroem mais aussi al., 1992). The rest three subscales off real mind-attitudes accounted for 38% of adaptation on survey circumstances. Cronbach (1951) alphas for those subscales was in fact .ninety to own football skills (six products), .86 to own physical condition (six affairs), and you may .85 for physical energy (six issues).
The new POSQ including shown an obvious factor construction to have interpretation. Several products emerged that have eigenvalues higher than step 1.00 and you may had been identified https://datingranking.net/cs/quickflirt-recenze/ as activity (six factors) and you can pride orientation (six activities) to own do so, bookkeeping for 34% and 21% of your variance inside the participants’ answers, correspondingly. The newest interfactor relationship is actually minimal (r = .04), in line with past browse (Appreciate Roberts, 1994; Roberts Treasure 1995) guaranteeing orthogonality of the two circumstances. Alpha coefficients was basically .71 and you can .ninety to do the job and you can ego direction to own take action subscales, correspondingly.
To have a look at the newest multivariate relationships between the linear integration of these two categories of details comprising bodily thinking-perceptions/purpose orientations to own take action, and you can indicator regarding built-in desire to possess get it done, canonical relationship are performed
The IMI together with presented a steady basis construction due to the fact all the situations piled to their respective activities fulfilling minimal criterion to get chosen to possess interpretation. Eigenvalues were greater than step 1.00 on attention/pleasure (5 products), perceived ability (cuatro things), effort/strengths (5 facts), and tension/pressure (4 situations) intrinsic motivation subscales, correspondingly, accounting for 60.1% of your own difference regarding circumstances. Interior precision coefficients have been .82 (interest/enjoyment), .77 (seen ability), .76 (effort/ importance), and .77 (tension/ pressure) into the built-in inspiration getting do so subscales.
Setting and standard deviations of the bodily notice-feeling (PSPP), task and you can pride orientations getting take action (POSQ), and you can intrinsic inspiration getting do so (IMI) subscales was presented in the Table 1. Tall no order correlations (2-tailed) was in fact noticed ranging from activity direction to own take action and both attention/exhilaration (r .29), and energy/characteristics (r = .36). Self-perceptions from health were relevant so you’re able to desire/excitement (r = .49), perceived ability (roentgen .59), effort/importance (roentgen = .49), and you may stress/tension (r = -.27).
The latest predictor variables was indeed consisting of mind-perceptions out of football skills, health, and you will physical stamina, as well as activity and you may pride orientations getting take action. The latest traditional details contains the brand new four tips out-of intrinsic desire getting do it, particularly, interest/exhilaration, thought proficiency, effort/benefits, and you can tension/tension.
74, F(4, 252) = ,p <.0001). Follow-up canonical correlation analysis indicated three significant functions emerged. However, only the first function exceeded the .30 criterion (10% of the variance) suggested as the minimal level for meaningful interpretation (Tabachnick Fidell, 1989). 68 ([R.sup.2]= .46). A minimal canonical loading of .30 is considered to contribute significantly to the multivariate relationship (Pedhazur, 1982). As Table 2 demonstrates, a high positive loading on physical condition, and moderately positive loadings on task orientation for exercise, sports competence, and physical strength, were positively associated to the criterion set of variables composed of interest/ enjoyment, perceived competence, and effort/importance, and were negatively relat ed to tension/pressure for exercise. Ego orientation for exercise, however, failed to significantly contribute to the multivariate relationship. The redundancy index revealed that 16% of the variance in the four indices of intrinsic motivation for exercise could be explained by the linear combination of the predictor variables. A redundancy value of 10% is recommended as a significant and meaningful cutoff for interpretation (Pedhazur, 1982).